Friday, 20 September 2013

Everybody's a little bit racist, sometimes

BUT ESPECIALLY THE GERMANS*

Well, no, but, here's the thing... Jump to the end for the disclaimers, and just stick with me.

Race and racism or, more specifically, how different societies deal with the fact of cultural diversity and migration, have been topics I've been wrestling with a lot in my own PhD research, as well as personally as an American and a migrant myself. As I've come to better understand how German society talks about and politically deals with diversity, the more and more startlingly foreign it has begun to seem. My native society admittedly has a huge number of lingering racial issues, but the discourse (excuse the academic language) here in Deutschland is at times striking for how.. and this isn't a word I use lightly.. backwards it can seem to someone from the outside.

I finally decided to write something about this partially in response to a piece in a magazine for expats, written by Jacinta Nandi, a British woman with a South Asian heritage who has been living and raising a child in Berlin for quite a few years. Click here to read it, then come back to me. It is obvious that she was in a state of anger while writing (and for good reason) - it's a feeling that has bubbled up inside me from time to time when hearing the things people can say, or learning of policies I find racist and offensive. I'm a cis-gendered, white, American male - if this shit pisses me off, I can't imagine what it would be like to be personally targeted by the people around me based on how I look. The worst I get is, "O, yeah, I could tell you were US-American from your dialect." (you mean accent, jackass) I can't imagine how I'd feel if I were a black person and someone referred to my baby as a 'chocolate sprinkle' or if I were of Asian heritage, and suddenly people on the subway starting pulling their eyes into slits and saying konichiwa. (Check the comments section on the original article.)

Anyway, her piece brought up a bunch of really interesting insights into the 'topography of the discourse' on racism in Germany that I've been exploring academically, and want to just delve into them here. By 'topography of the discourse' I mean the way people from all 'sides' of the debate talk about the issues, rather than just the positions they take. This is, in any case, as much an exercise in working out my own thoughts as it is (hopefully) a contribution to a debate that is desperately needed.

Jacinta Nandi: "Sometimes I don't think Germans find anything racist except for Nazi demos in Hellersdorf, the actual Holocaust and Rosa Parks not being allowed to sit down on the bus."

I've had a version of this thought many times. It has seemed to me, again and again, that Germans, especially liberal/lefty types, spend lots of energy obsessing over the fringe neo-Nazi element in society, while ignoring the fact that, HELLO, everyday racism can be found right across the broad spectrum of the population. Sure, violent Nazi attacks are bad, but the way of thinking that makes them possible are not exclusive to the fringes of society. There are, as I see it, some historical and psychological reasons for this focus.

So, there was the Nazi era. That is the last time anyone speaking German talked about "races" as if they were real, actually existing things. Of course, scientifically, they're not - the human population is biologically and genetically very uniform in comparison to, for example, some other primate species. Due to history, however, 'race' as such is a very real social fact in places like the United States and denying that it plays a role in social life is delusional. Use of the word race in German, on the other hand, automatically makes you sound like you're participating in a Nazi era discourse (sort of like using the word Negroid would make you sound crazy and old-timey in America) - you can't. As a result, the only people who can be racist, in this logic, are people who actually are Nazis. In the German discourse, then, stopping racism means the same thing as stopping Nazis. It rarely means checking your privilege, or reflecting on the way using certain words might make minorities feel, or whatever. Of course, it is also understood that racism exists where there are no Nazis, but this usually means America or other foreign countries. I also think it's a lot easier to just focus on hating Nazis than it is to look at oneself and one's own friends and families for the fucked up ways of thinking that are inevitably lurking in the background.

Obviously there are not only the fringe Nazis and then everyone else in Germany, free of any racist/xenophobic thoughts. Racism, or ethnicism, or whatever you want to call it, is pervasive in society. Sure, you can't say 'the Jews' without someone spitting out their drink, but call a black kid a chocolate sprinkle or call mallowmars Nigger-kisses, and that's just fine, because you don't mean them in a negative way. Consider this recent (sadly, real) conversation I had with a new acquaintance (a young, hipstery type, not a grandpa from Brandenburg):

Dude: Oh, wow, you haven't been here that long but your German is really good. (disbelief! cuz, German must be the hardest language, like, ever!)
Me: Oh, well, you know, I had three years of it at university in the US first. Plus, its not like.. Chinese, it's not the hardest language for a native English speaker to learn.
Dude: Tell that to the Turk* (dem Türken) who was born here and has lived here for twenty years and still can't speak German properly.
Me: OMG THAT'S SO RACIST.
Dude: It's not racist if it's true. (!!!!!!) You can hear them on the U-bahn and at work, it's ridiculous.
Me: ::Vomits on his shoe::
*emphasis added

See what he did there? The "Turk" was born here and has lived here his whole life.. but, he's somehow still not German. Of course, many people don't see it that way, but this way of thinking has roots in the ethnic notion of citizenship that was law in Germany right up until just about 10 years ago. Also, no one has lived here for their whole lives without being able to speak German. I just don't believe that. He may have a different accent and use some different slang because of the community he's from, but so do lots of white kids from those areas nowadays. And that's not a failure, or a degradation of society. That's called diversity!

Accents shift, new immigrant groups change the societies they come into (why do you think Boston and NYC have different accents? Different mixes of immigrant groups historically and today!). This, however, is unacceptable to lots of people. If it is not viewed as a failing of the minorities, then (and this is often the lefty view) it is a failing of the state to integrate them properly. The "foreigners", in this view, need to be helped to be more like the majority, and that's somehow not a racist way of approaching the issue, because helping them is a positive thing. It can be, only, it's not, not when you approach it that way. Banning kids in kindergartens and primary schools from speaking Turkish to each other is NOT OK even if you're just trying to help them learn German. If schools are majority 'migration background', then bring in white kids from other parts of the city, don't ban the 'brown ones' from speaking their second native language to each other on the playground. If kids in majority-minority schools bully the few white kids, that isn't equivalent to the structural and individual racism people with Turkish backgrounds face throughout their lives. I'm sorry, it's just not. That's bullying, not racism. That the term Deutschfeindlichkeit (hostility to Germans) exists, as if it were some equivalent to Ausländerfeindlichkeit (hostility to foreigners), boggles my fucking mind.

The way the discourse plays out here can sound really naive, and even offensive, to some people coming from the outside. Sometimes it feels like no one here has heard of structural racism, intersectionality, examining one's own privilege, etc.  Even a lot of the people who mean well just seem hopeless sometimes, because they are sort of stuck, stuck in the discourse this society can offer. Like when the Carnival of Cultures in Berlin, instead of being like the Notting Hill Carnival in London, ends up feeling a lot like one of those human-zoo World's Fair exhibitions from the 1890s. Or the Marxist party campaign posters with little black kids in 'traditional garb' shaking maracas, with some bullshit slogan about solidarity underneath. All that gets really frustrating. So frustrating that at times you need to write a piece like this one, or the one Jacinta wrote, because you just can't even take one more minute of it. This isn't to say that the US or British ways of approaching these issues are 100% right, or that they're racism-free (ha!), but I do think they have more experience of confronting these issues than German society does. It's not only the minorities who need to adjust to be successful in Germany, it's Germany that needs to adjust to be successful as a modern, diverse society.

*I use 'the Germans' here broadly, knowing full well that it is really generalizing - but sometimes you need to generalize. German society DOES have a different discourse on race and minorities than the US, even if individuals within the society might not always fit into this generalization. But, societal and political discourses aren't individual so I don't care, in this instance, about speaking in broad terms. Sorry in advance if you feel offended by that - go and check your privilege.

Now if you made it this far and you're really pissed off at me, or racism, or whatever, watch the video.

8 comments:

  1. Dear Andy,
    I am not an academic so I probably think about racism far less precisely than I could but as one of the Germans I feel I need to clarify a couple of things.
    When it comes to immigration and inclusion Germany comes from a very different place than the US. I am aware that it all sounds very old and boring but Germany is a very old place with very old rules and rituals, the statehood of Germany is founded on a cultural continuity. We are the local equivalent of Native Americans and people feel that they get to choose who gets admitted to their tribe and under which conditions. Language is central to what it means to be German and I really can’t see how a language requirement for immigrants is racist. Banning second languages is a separate question – and I absolutely agree that it is more harmful than beneficial – but why shouldn’t we be allowed to force people who want to be part of our tribe to adopt one of our uniting traits, our language?
    When immigrants have been successfully culturally integrated – and I am not talking about complete assimilation, just integration, which presupposes language acquisition – physical traits become less important. Once you speak standard German the question of your heritage becomes less important – no matter if your ancestors came from Eastern Germany, Bavaria, Ghana or Anatolia. Yes, you will probably get comments about your skin colour but it’s just the same as if you were 1,40m or 2,20m tall or had naturally blue hair. You have traits that are absolutely extraordinary for the majority population so they will comment. That is very rude but I am not sure it is racist.
    Words shape reality so I agree that non-racist language is very important. Germany is however once again very different from the UK and the US in this respect because we do not share your history of slavery. All our immigrants have come here of their own accord and in German we don’t even have words like Nigger and golliwog. The correct translation of Negerküsse isn’t Nigger kisses but Negro kisses which I believe makes quite a difference. German didn’t have different words for black people, there was just the one and it wasn’t pejorative but just descriptive. It has fallen out of use because of its proximity to the very historically charged English term but has survived in some names for sweets. Today people have largely forgotten that only 50 or 60 years ago in everyday language “Jew” stood for greedy and “Negro” for poor. There is nowhere in Germany where that kind of language would pass today. But do we really need to rename sweets with old fashioned names like Negro kisses and Moor in a shirt (Mohr im Hemd)? There is nothing negative about those sweets and their names are quaint and old-fashioned not offensive.
    Of course everything isn’t just swell when it comes to racism in Germany. But German language requirements for immigrants, the odd child or rude idiot commenting on your skin colour and the names of sweets aren’t the major problems you make them out to be. They are just proof of the difficulty a culturally and genetically largely homogeneous country has trying to cope with immigration without giving up its identity and traditions. Change is a celebrated part of US identity and culture and therefore makes immigration an easier task for US society. Germany wants to continue in its old traditional ways and doesn’t want to be changed by immigration more than strictly necessary. But is that really racism?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hello Anonymous,

    Thank you for your comment, which you clearly put some effort into! To address your questions directly:
    1. I never said I was against a language requirement for immigrants (I suppose you mean, to become citizens). Though you rightly assumed I don't really think that's so great. It is probably to the benefit of the immigrant to learn some German, and most will. (Ich kann schon relativ gut Deutsch, vielen Dank!) By the second generation, they always will. By the third generation, the 'original' language is usually no longer spoken. This is borne out by research. I don't think anyone should really be 'forced' to learn a language when it is unnecessary for their everyday lives. German will not die out as a language because some elderly Turkish woman continues to speak Turkish with her family and friends. It's a shame that gets on some peoples' sacks, they obviously have few things in life to worry about! I'm envious of such people.
    2. Ask black people, or other minorities, what they think of these terms. I'd be willing to guess that most don't like them, or don't like the comments people make to them on the ubahn. So stop. It's not up to you to decide whether they are offensive, it is up to the people being offended. The world is globalized, and if Neger is an unpleasant word for most black people living in Germany because of its connection to the English word, then the white people should stop saying it. Granted, the names of sweets are the least of the issues most 'Menschen mit Migrationshintergrund' face - they are, quite simply, treated differently based on how they look, or what their accent is, quite a lot of the time. That is unacceptable.
    3. If EVERYONE in Germany wants it to remain like some idealized notion from a Heimat-film from the 1950s (or earlier..) then no immigrants or tourists should be allowed in, and Germany should cut itself off from the rest of the world entirely. The bottom line is, societies DO change, whether you like it or not. Making immigrants and their children feel bad about being different isn't the way to preserve some ideal-typical notion of what German-ness is. Unless you want German-ness to mean unwelcoming of anyone who is different.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Also, no. Negro-kisses does not sound any better than nigger-kisses. Just fyi. Do not call black people negros!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hi Andy,

    thank you for your article,which I find very insightful. I'm German so it's interesting for me to read a text on this topic written by a non-German.

    I agree with you on a lot of things, for example that banning kids from speaking their native language is not okay (did you know that Schäuble once asked Turkish mothers to speak (only) German with their kids?!). Unfortunately, it is not possible for the adminstrations to just "bring more white kids" into the schools. The only people who can actually do that are the parents. So in order for that to happen, you would need to amend regulations.

    Re "Also, no one has lived here for their whole lives without being able to speak German. I just don't believe that.", I have met a few people who had been in Germany for well over twenty and were not able to even say a complete sentence in German(I'm not exaggerating). They were the parents of my Turkish friends, and granted, they hadn't spent their whole lives in Germany, but with that kind of level of fluency after twenty years I'm not sure it would have made much of a difference.
    I think the reason was that they had always meant to return to Turkey one day, buy a house, settle down and spend the rest of their lives there. And even when it became obvious that was not going to happen, they didn't want to let go of that dream. None of them ever made an effort to learn German because (I think) that would have meant admitting their dream was not going to come true.

    The bottom line of this was that they were always going to be dependant on someone translating for them, usually their kids (at least for as long as they still lived with them, anyway), since they all spoke German fluently. This made things very difficult for them (feeling unsure and inferiour when talking to their kids' teachers), and in some cases even dangerous (not being able to speak to a doctor or paramedic in case of illness or an emergency).

    In the case of my friends' parents, "foreigners" "to be more like the majority" (i.e., to master the native language of the majority) would have made their lives a lot easier, but I realise that it's not easy to motivate people to learn German without coming across as condescending or patronising, and that, after all, they have a right to not learn German if they prefer not to.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Sorry, typo queen.
    That would be
    "In the case of my friends' parents, HELPING "foreigners" "to be more like the majority"..."

    ReplyDelete
  6. Hey typo queen,
    Of course I realise 'bringing more white kids in' to these schools would require policy change (and political will). But, I think it is possible.. many places in the US did it to end the de facto racial segregation of many schools, especially in the North. Granted, it often wasn't an easy task (just google Boston and bussing..), but I think in the long run it has probably had an impact of the way the generations who have gone through school see race (ie, they see it far less!).
    Re, learning German - the anecdote I discussed was in reference to someone who had been born here, not who came here as an adult. While I'd admit there are many reasons it would probably be useful for these adults to learn German, I don't think it is necessarily bad if they don't. In any case, your friends with these Turkish-speaking parents speak German as their second native language - which I think rather supports the idea that these families have linguistically integrated rather in line with what research into immigration has borne out in many contexts. The research suggests your friends (theoretical?) children may not even be able to speak Turkish, when that time comes. Which is partly why I find it bizarre that people and politicians get themselves so stressed about something that will work itself out simply via generational change. First generation immigrants almost never have it easy - designing policies to decrease the troubles they have, while not castigating them for perceived lack of integration (as if it's usually a conscious decision), is not the way.

    ReplyDelete
  7. But in the States you still expect people to speak English in order to manage in the society, do you not? Having different accents in NYC is a completely different thing.

    Nope, I'm not German.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think it is somewhat different. People in America who say "I expect immigrants to learn English if they want to be accepted as members of society" are generally regarded as sort of.. racist. In any case, it is a conservative viewpoint. Most people DO acknowledge it is far easier for people to manage in society if they can at least speak some English, but that is different from EXPECTING them to as some sort of normative requirement. This is why public bodies create signs and documents (even the voting ballots where I am from) in a multitude of languages, in addition to English. It's also why "English as a Second Language" is widely available in public schools. It acknowledges people would have an easier time if they could speak english, but at the same time doesn't necessarily expect it of them. I can't vote in Germany, so I don't know if the ballots are offered in languages other than German, though I'd guess probably not.

      Delete